| The Center Holds |
April 9, 2000 |
Two fellows in a hot air balloon were passing over the
countryside. They were lost. They saw a man walking along a country
road.
They lowered the balloon. One called down to him, "Can
you tell us where we are?"
He said, "Certainly, you're in a hot air balloon."
The man in the balloon turned to his friend and said;
"That man is an economist, what he said is absolutely
true,
but of no practical use whatsoever."
That could be changed to a theologian, telling us things that are
absolutely true, but of no practical use whatsoever.
We are headed for Easter....
and are presently in Lent...
that time of self-examination, repentance,
of setting our face toward God...
a lot of us want to get to Easter as quickly as we can...
I think we've missed the point of Lent...
it is not for us to feel dutifully guilty...
though some of us are in the gifted program of feeling guilty...
The point of Lent is to prepare us to follow Jesus...
from a physical being to a spiritual being.
I was thinking of this last week as I pondered my
work, my call,
and my job....
and I came to the conclusion that my job, is to fire the Spiritual
engine of this church.
I am a fireman on this train.
And it has been my observation that as we approach Easter,
if we only retell the events then we are not really fulfilling our
office...
we must find a way to be in awe....
to ponder the mystery of the resurrection.
I was thinking on this...
and it occurred to me that the same mystery that brings us such joy
at Easter...
the death and resurrection of Jesus...
can also be the mystery which brings us such pain and anger in our
own lives...
when it is our kid or our suffering or our body that is being
offered up...
(because we expect God to do more for us and our kids than God did
for his own son.)
One of the mysteries we deal with is the reality of God...
and how God becomes known to us...
We have a way to explain it...
the doctrine of the trinity.
The Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
There are people who think that if you don't believe in the
doctrine of the trinity,
you're in danger of losing your soul.
I think that if you try to explain and understand the doctrine of
the trinity you're in danger of losing your mind.
Most of us believe in the trinity,
except for some Unitarians.
The trinity of course is a very old doctrine.
You can read about the Council of Nicea in a little town in what
is now Turkey.
Where in 325 all of the Bishops and church leaders gathered so
they could write down and decide what we believe,
especially what we believe about the mystery of the person of
Christ.
And if you look at 880 in your hymnal you'll find the Nicean Creed.
The Bishops came and each brought his own parethis.
A parathesis was a theologian.
Bishops were politicians, not theologians.
Not a whole lot has changed in almost 1700 Years.
The two parathesis were Athenatious and Aires.
And they argued for days at Nicea.
And all the people were gathered there.
Aires was beginning to get the better of the argument.
Aires was what was known as a homaecian.
He said that Jesus Christ was of like-essence to God the father.
Like essence, homoecian.
Athenatious was a homoucian.
Christ is of the same essence or substance as God.
Homoucian.
They argued for days, and finally the people began to shout.
And when folks start to shout, they lose their mind.
Folks started carrying on...
you've seen that...
they don't know what they're saying.
Somebody started shouting, "Homoucian,
Homoucian..."
and everybody took up the cry,
"Homoucian, Homoucian..."
And so Athenatious won. Really.
Of course they didn't settle it for a few years.
They rode poor old Aires out of town on a rail.
But Constantine the emperor liked Aires and was going to restore him
4 or 5 years later.
But on the very day he was to be restored, Aires died.
You know among Christians in the 4th Century there was an awful lot of
superstition.
They took this as a sign God didn't want us to be anything but
Homoucian...
the same essence...
so we became Trinitarians and here we are.
I want to tell you a story about twins, John and Michael.
This story was written by a psychologist named Oliver Saks and was
published in the February 28, 1985 issue of the New York Review of
Books
John and Michael were identical twins.
They had an incredible capacity for numbers.
They'd been the subjects, guinea pigs really, of many experiments
and tests by psychologists and psychiatrists.
Their talent for numbers is just amazing.
Give them a date within the last 40,000 years or the next 40,000
years and they, in a second, can tell you the day of the week that
date will fall on.
It is amazing how they do this.
Give them a twenty-digit number or a three hundred-digit number
makes no difference, they'll turn around and repeat it back to you.
They have almost total recall of their past from about their
fourth birthday.
Ask them what happened on Feb 4, 1952, they were born in
1940.
They will think a little bit and then they'll begin to tell you what
happened: the weather, events which often include stories of painful
anguish from childhood; contempt, jeers, mortification they endured
from other children because they didn't fit the norm.
You see, these twins are physically deformed and mentally
handicapped with an IQ of about 60.
They've spent most of their lives in mental hospitals.
Their performances apart from the controlled experiments with
professionals, are routines they've developed to entertain people at
hospital parties.
They belong to a group of people known as 'savant' -- that
is, mentally defective in all areas except one.
And they perform in that one capacity with extraordinary
wonder...
that is, numbers.
When asked how they can do that with numbers, they say,
"We see them!"
And evidently they do, with some kind of inner eye.
Oliver Saks
puts it,
"They have available to them a prodigious panorama of vast
landscape of everything they have ever heard, done, or
seen."
And in the blink of an eye, literally, because when you ask them,
they begin to roll their eyes like they're viewing a rewinding
tape.
And they can recall anything including the trillion or so events
that have happened in their lives.
Such powers are rare, but not unique.
In my hometown there was an old man who would watch the train go by
every day:
maybe 50 cars, maybe 100,
and when it passed he could turn around and tell you the numbers on
every one of those freight cars.
Six, eight, ten digit numbers.
'Savant'
That sounds strange to me since I carry cards and a calendar to
remind me what to do each day.
And then I forget where the notes are or forget to look at them.
This same capacity was recorded of Mozart.
You know he composed music when he was three years old.
It was recorded that when he was two he heard a pig squeal...
and this little two year old yelled out, 'G Sharp!"
And somebody remembered the pig squeal, went running to a piano, and
sure enough it was G sharp.
Mozart had what was called 'absolute pitch.'
I suppose the twins, John and Michael, have absolute numbers.
Saks said one day he was talking with them and a big box of
matches fell off the table and spilled.
John immediately said "111."
Michael said, "37. 37. 37."
Saks counted the matches and there were exactly 111 matches.
Turning to Michael he asked why he said 37?
Michael said, "37, 37, 37, 111."
He had factored. Now that's amazing!
What I want to tell you about are not all these stunts and tricks
they perform.
I want to tell you about the contemplation.
Which when they're by themselves, they do.
One day, Saks saw the two boys sitting together.
They were alone, and he said they had a kind of beatific look on
their faces.
They were absolutely in sweet communion...so serene... so at peace.
He slipped up close enough to hear them.
He listened, and being sort of a numbers freak himself,
he realized they were calling out 9 digit prime numbers -- that is,
numbers that cannot be divided by any other whole number but itself
and one.
Next day, he took to the hospital a book that had a list of prime
numbers up to 10 digits.
They were again sitting in communion, carried away into some other
existence calling off nine digit prime numbers.
Saks snuck up and he called of a nine-digit prime number.
They smiled, they had a new playmate, and he joined them.
Then Saks got smart, looked at his book and called off a 10-digit
prime.
They smiled again and started calling out ten-digit prime
numbers.
Then one of them called out a twelve-digit prime number.
Saks was out of it.
He'd been cribbing.
He said an hour later those boys were calling off 24 digit prime
numbers.
He said it was a kind of joy that came over them.
From this he drew some fascinating conclusions.
The twins, who incidentally cannot calculate, divide, subtract, etc,
nevertheless have what can only be called a sense of numbers.
The same way a musician has a sense of harmony.
Indeed he compared them to musicians and quoted the words of Sir
Thomas Bounds,
"Whoever is harmonically composed, delights in harmony and a
profound contemplation of the first composer.
Whose soul is harmonic has it's nearest sympathy to music."
And then he quoted the philosopher Litnets,
"Music is nothing but unconscious arithmetic."
Then it hits me, maybe the soul, your soul, my soul, maybe the
soul is harmonic.
No matter what one's IQ, whether it be the IQ of John and Michael or
Robert Oppenheimer,
Maybe the soul is harmonic.
And the soul responds to wholeness and harmony,
in fact it looks for it,
longs for it, searches for it.
What the twins show us in a kind of controlled
experiment is that when human life is not bound by the capacities
we develop in order to function in the so-called 'normal' world,
then it is free to do what it was created to do.
And what the soul was created to do is to seek out and sense the
harmony and wholeness in all of creation.
In contemplating the perfection of numbers,
the twins were praising and delighting in the harmony of the
universe.
That accounts for the look of serenity on their faces,
as a kind of beatific joy,
like a mystic contemplating God.
They saw numbers as holy, filled with significance.
Their symmetry is holy to them, as though they had beheld the first
composer.
It was their way of singing praises to God.
It is as if when the soul is finally free, we sing!
Which in turn reminded me of that wonderful phrase in the Old
Catechism that my Presbyterian friends had to learn before they
could join the church, and something Methodists borrowed.
The very first question in that old Catechism,
"What is the chief end of man?"
"To glorify God and praise God forever!"
That's a wonderful, marvelous phrase, maybe we're onto something
here -- the chief end of humanity?
Why are you here?
Maybe the difficulty we have with the doctrine of the
trinity,
and the other doctrines about God,
is that we approach them as if they are rational definitions of
God,
the way we would define, say, a tree or table.
Maybe God cannot be understood by our minds,
if God could, then God wouldn't be God.
The lesser cannot grasp the greater.
The great Jewish theologian Montetheor said,
"To define God, one would have to be God."
We can't understand God.
In fact, maybe God is not to be defined at all.
Maybe God is to be glorified and enjoyed.
The trinity does not contain God.
The trinity is not an explanation as much as it is an instrument
that awakens in us the harmony and wholeness that is God.
So to say,
"The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit,"
to say that is to marvel at the mystery,
that's all, not explain it.
That is hard for us, because we're Protestants.
We're inheritors of the protestant reformation,
and the reformation has shaped us more that we realize.
The reformers were ones who were trying to nail down the right
answers.
It was an intellectual revolution really.
The thing they were concerned about was finding the right
beliefs.
To get the right beliefs it had to stand counter to what was
declared false.
So they drew up creeds and catechism to test our faithfulness.
And to this day, you and I will run into people who will test
whether or not we are Christians by what we say we believe.
"You believe in the virgin birth?'"
"No." "Then you're not a Christian"
"You believe in the resurrection of the body of Jesus Christ?"
"No." "Then you're not a Christian"
You have to say yes to these things or they will put you in a
basket and cart you off to hell itself.
"You believe in the absolute inerrancy of
Scripture?" "No." "Then you're not a
Christian"
We are judged whether or not we are Christians on the basis of
how we answer their questions,
as if faith is a matter of right beliefs.
I'm a child of the reformation,
I'm in its debt,
but I wonder if we have paid a very high price...
The loss of the esthetic,
now please hear this,
the loss of the esthetic dimension and the non-rational dimension of
religion.
And shorn of that capacity we are as vulnerable as sea birds caught
in an oil slick.
It gets in their feathers and they lose their buoyancy,
and down they go.
We're just that vulnerable if we depend on reason and intellect
alone.
Reason and intellect are fine as long as everything goes
well.
Good job, children all ok, happy with your spouse, new car,
beautiful house -- sure, God's blessing you real good and answering
all your prayers...
But let something go wrong and then what happens?
"Oh, but he was such a good man,
he believed in God and never missed church.
Why does God do a thing like this to him?
Look at him, dying of a heart attack..."
or
"I have prayed every night for years and God hasn't answered
my prayers,
therefore there is no God."
Reason leaves us in the lurch.
But what if, what if when reason and intellect fail,
there are other powers that can comprehend the depth of things.
What if faith is not so much a matter of believing things as it
is a matter of sensing that which the mind cannot understand?
What if having faith were like the twins capacity to perceive
harmony and wholeness in the randomness of numbers?
Or finding order in the chaos of a pile of spilled matches or the
ability to hear music in the mundane cry of a pig-squeal?
Our first text this morning, Old, Testament, book of Job.
Poetry, a Psalm really, a psalm of praise to the creator.
It envisions the beginning of creation that God created the world
with wisdom.
Wisdom is the ability to create order and make sense.
So to say that God created the world with wisdom is to say that our
life is created to make sense.
To hold together, to be meaningful.
Above all it means that God knew what God was doing when God
created the world in the first place.
God even knew what God was doing when God created us.
The book of Job is wisdom literature.
The message of Job is that when things go to pieces and fall
apart;
when things don't work out for a good person;
when things fall apart, trust in God, for there is wisdom, wisdom
far beyond our wisdom,
there is a sense of things that may not make sense to us.
God says to Job,
"Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?
Tell me if YOU understand!"
There is an order to the world that is not visible to us that
was here before we came and will be here long after we are gone, trust
it!
In our New Testament lesson, Paul identifies Jesus with wisdom,
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all
creation, for in him all things were created, he is before all
things, and in him all things hold together! "
Later the theologians saw a parallel between these texts and
said,
"the wisdom that was with God at the creation was also with
Jesus."
By then they called the wisdom the Holy Spirit.
So they affirmed that we have one God;
Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
There's harmony in that, unity, though we may never
understand it, we can marvel at it and glory in it,
and trust it, trust that the center holds even when things
fall apart.
As I wrap this up, let me go back to the twins.
After being together for about 40 years,
it was reasoned by the professionals,
that for their own good,
they should be separated in order to end their 'unhealthy'
communication.
They were moved to separate halfway houses where they do menial
chores to make a little money in order to live.
So what happened? You know
They lost their powers. They lost their powers.
Without the communion of each other they lost the sense of
wholeness of things.
They lost that sense of joy in their lives.
That was the price they had to pay in order to live socially
acceptable lives.
WHAT A PARABLE!
What price did we pay in order to do the same thing?
What faculties were we born with that have atrophied because they
were not useful in the pursuit of goals the world deems important?
Maybe the first faculty we lost was the ability to see the center
of the universe.
The ability to look at nature and numbers and music and see the hand
of the master workman.
Saks observed,
"There is no longer any center to their lives."
And W.B. Yates writes,
"When the center no longer holds, the world flies
apart."
So lets take Paul seriously,
"Jesus is the first born of all creation. In him all things
hold together."
So we had better hold on, trust in, and stay pretty close to
Jesus.
Let us pray...
In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit
|