| Forgiveness Stinks |
March 26, 2000 |
Forgiveness is a fad these days, a full-fledged flavor of the
month.
Turn on any TV station, and the odds are good you'll witness a
dramatic episode of forgiveness.
Maybe a long-estranged mother and daughter will dash to embrace one
another,
a put-upon wife will step forward to absolve her sorry excuse of a
husband,
or a scandal-plagued politician will pander for pardon.
Reconciliation is burning hot, hot, hot right now, and Christians
are usually the ones fanning the flames of forgiveness.
But maybe we need another look at forgiveness.
And don't think I'm going to exhaust what needs to be said here.
Where I want to start... Fretting for forgiveness can make some of
our Scriptures hard to hear ...
like today's.
Psalm 50
insists that God is coming to judge us. Yes, JUDGE
us.
"Our God comes and does not keep silence, before him is a
devouring fire,
and a mighty tempest (violent storm) all around him"
(Psalm 50:3).
That's a bit harsh. Makes me squirm in my seat a bit.
But not according to the psalmist.
"The heavens declare his righteousness, for God himself is
judge"
(Psalm 50:6).
The God who summons heaven and earth that he may judge his people
is clearly a counter-cultural Creator, one who is more concerned
about eradicating evil than raising television ratings.
Selling commercial time and airing a really huge hit....whether or
not Oprah continues to gain popularity... means nothing to a Lord
who is committed to justice.
So what are we to make of the orgy of forgiveness that is going
on all around us?
It seems so caring and so loving and so CHRISTIAN to jump right
in.
It feels so spiritually right to forgive...so spiritually
mature... to forgive with haste.
After all, haven't we heard the parable of the Prodigal Son since
we first toddled off to Sunday school, and been pounded by the
preaching of forgiveness and reconciliation since we first plopped
into a seat?
Failure to pardon, we're constantly warned, will
blight our lives; refusal to forgive is considered a big, fat
"F" for sinners like ourselves who have been forgiven by
God.
But must we ALWAYS forgive?
Psychotherapist Jeanne Safer raises this provocative point in a
recent issue of Psychology Today (July/August 1999).
She stresses that some of the most admirable, sane and
emotionally healthy people that she knows have - on occasion - not
forgiven.
They have done this as a legitimate move, not as a flight from
forgiveness or a retreat into paranoia; they have taken this path
because it has been the right thing to do (32).
Safer describes how you can refuse to absolve your spouse, parent,
sibling or friend ... and still be emotionally healthy.
Maybe we disciples of a Divine Judge should try this on for
size.
Let's take a minute to slip into the possibility of NOT forgiving,
and see if it fits.
What could it mean to be a "moral unforgiver," a
truth-teller who finds that the most moral of stances is to refuse
to pardon?
Perhaps we'll see that in some situations forgiveness really
flops, and we would do well to avoid the temptation to rush to
reconciliation.
Consider the case of Sandy Katz, a woman who grew up with a
violent bully of an older brother.
As a child, he abused her with a screwdriver, and even set her on
fire.
Throughout all this violence, her parents looked the other way and
never acknowledged what he did to her.
"He continued to behave this way and they continued to insist
that I submit,"
recalls Sandy; "my mother would say, 'He's just trying to get
close to you because he doesn't know how to be friends.'"
Yeah, right.
Parents like these often feel pressure to promote family harmony,
so they deny one child's viciousness and try to force the victimized
child to be "mature" and "rise above it."
But Sandy knew that she was being abused and that justice was not
being done, so at age 35 she finally defied her parents by refusing
her brother's phone calls.
"I started getting guilt-inducing messages from them saying
that I was abandoning him and destroying the family," she
recounts.
"They became increasingly angry and accusatory, haranguing me
to forgive and forget without admitting there was anything to
forgive and forget."
Sandy penned her brother a note detailing what he had done, and
saying she wouldn't speak to him until he was willing to acknowledge
it.
He responded with a letter taking the moral high ground, saying that
he was just as hurt as she was, and that all children fight - as if
abuse with tools and fire is part of normal childhood
squabbling!
He said he was willing to let bygones be bygones, so why couldn't
she?
Hello-o? Anybody home? Time to forget forgiveness and
take a stand as a moral unforgiver.
You say: Excuse me, but I will not be reconciled with you until
you acknowledge that you have abused me.
You say: Thank you very much but I will not forgive you unless
there's a little C & R going on here - confession and repentance
(see 1 John 1:8-10).
Easy forgiveness makes for hard justice. It's not going to
happen.
Better for the offender to understand that from the get-go.
"What right have you to recite my statutes?" God rants at
the wicked in Psalm 50.
"For you hate discipline, and you cast my words behind you.
You make friends with a thief when you see one, and you keep company
with adulterers"
(Psalm 50:16-18).
There's no justice as long as people persist in mouthing empty
phrases, despising discipline and ignoring God's words.
Sandy Katz has taken a stand as a moral unforgiver, refusing to
be reconciled until her brother takes some responsibility for his
actions.
"It's not so much what my brother did as a child, but what
he continues to be as a man that I find unacceptable," Sandy
asserts.
"He hasn't changed, never grew, and just found new ways to
feel entitled.
It would only be right to forgive what he did as a child - it would
be legitimate and healthy for everybody.
But it would be wrong not to hold him responsible for being an
undeveloped person now."
Because truth and justice are important to Sandy - as they
are to God - she feels that clear judgments must be made before
there can be reconciliation.
But hold on. Back that train into the station for just one
second: Didn't Jesus proclaim,
"Do not judge, so that you may not be judged"
(Matthew 7:1)?
Yes, he did. But he was warning us about judging others while
absolving ourselves.
He doesn't expect us to be morally and emotionally blind to
injustice.
His challenge is to apply the same high standards to yourself as
you do to others, for
"with the judgment you make you will be judged,
and the measure you give will be the measure you get"
(Matthew 7:2).
We Christians are to be truth-tellers about ourselves and others.
To be clear-eyed about evil and unwilling to dispense cheap
grace.
To pull the railroad ties out of our own eyes, so that we can see
clearly to take the toothpicks out of a neighbor's eye.
To hold ourselves to the same set of expectations that we have for
others so that we can all stand on equal footing before God --
equally honest about our failures and equally desperate for
forgiveness.
Here's the deal: Forgiveness doesn't work unless accompanied by
honesty.
And if you're the bad guy, you can't expect God, friends or
spouse to say, "Sure, we forgive you."
Okay, so you didn't have sex with that woman, but both you and
those you have offended must be unflinchingly frank or it's a no-go
all the way around.
Forget Clintonian semantics or you can forget forgiveness.
There is no free forgiveness.
Forgiveness was not free for Adam and Eve - they got evicted.
Not for David after his fling with Bathsheba - the child and
thousands of others die.
Not for Samson - he dies blind in a pile of rubble.
Not for King Saul - he dies on his sword.
Not for Ananias and Sapphira - they lie, they die.
Not for John Mark - Paul sends him packing.
So you've been cheated, abused, battered, lied to, stolen from
and deprived of.
What are you going to do? Just say it's okay?
True, there are some conditions under which you may be able to
offer forgiveness finally,
but that's not what we're talking about here.
You can't just say, "Forget about it."
Forgiveness is not about forgetting.
Forgiveness is something that happens in us... that is our coming
to peace with what has happened to us and no longer seeking revenge
for it.
No longer staying awake over it.
No longer feeling burned over it.
No longer wanting to leave the planet when that person is near
us.
No longer wishing to visit the sweetness of revenge on them...
In his book The Art of Forgiving... on page 25, Lewis
Smedes makes these observations.
Forgiving happens inside the person who does it.
Forgiving is not about reunion.
Forgiving does not obligate us to go back.
And therein lies what I think is the answer... for those who would
be spiritually mature...
To keep a line between forgiving and reconciling.
I think Sandy Katz is just a bit confused... or doesn't know the
difference between forgiveness and reconciliation.
Desmond Tutu says it this way... "Forgive, yes, the victims
of injustice and oppressions must be ever ready to forgive."
But can there be a coming together?
Tutu continues,
"Those who have wronged us must be ready to make what
amends they can... If I have stolen your pen, I can't really
be contrite when I say, "Please forgive me" if at
the same time I keep your pen.
If I am truly repentant, then I will demonstrate this genuine
repentance by returning your pen.
Then reunion,which is always costly, will happen...
it can't happen just by saying, "Let bygones be bygones."
We can forgive him if he keeps the pen.
We should not be his friend unless he gives the pen back." (The
Rainbow People of God 1994)
I think, in the end, to forgive is to say, I'm moving on and I'm
not taking baggage with me.
It isn't to forget where we've been...
And forgiveness is not to be confused with reconciliation.
Smedes continues... (p27)
It takes one person to forgive
It takes two to be reunited.
Forgiving happens inside the wounded person.
Reunion happens in a relationship between people.
We can forgive a person who never says he is sorry.
We cannot be truly reunited unless he is honestly sorry.
We can forgive even if we do not trust the person who wronged us
once not to wrong us again.
Reunion can happen only if we can trust the person who wronged us
once not to wrong us again.
Forgiving has no strings attached.
Reunion has several strings attached.
I'm going to end there...
to not provide a summary statement...
but to leave you hanging...
To think about what you will do...
|