Catalina United Methodist Church Home
Sunday Morning Live!
A Contemporary Service
 
Soul Talk
by Jonathan Arnpriester
 
March 19, 2000
 

No Cut on That Take March 19, 2000
Mark 9:2-9

Anyone listen to the game yesterday afternoon from 3 to 6?

I held out hope that the Wildcats might beat Wisconsin
until there were only 2 seconds left
and there was a 3 possession lead.

The University of Arizona Wildcats men's basketball team...

heavily favored...
the number one seed in the Western conference,
fell to Wisconsin.
We all know the welcome for the wildcats
will be much smaller than the one they would have received
if they'd won the national title again.

And now we are going to have to think about

how we think about losing.
A couple of weeks ago we talked about
how we don't model our own losing well to our children.

And here we are with an up-front opportunity

to talk about losing again.

We know what to do with winners...

we lift them up,
we grant them privilege,
we call them great,
and they become even more independent.

But we don't know what to do with losing.

It is counter to the American dream,
it is counter to working our way up the ladder,
counter to pulling ourselves up by our bootstraps.

The bible does have some words to offer to us...

Jesus tells a story (Luke 15:11-24)
of a young man who goes to his father, says,
"Father, I'd like my half of the inheritance now."
In other words,
I no longer need you.

The text tells us the young man went to the place

where winners congregate
and began to live like a winner
(on money that came to him by not a lick of his own winning.)

But nonetheless he lived like a winner...

high style,
drinking like a winner,
dressing like a winner,
running in the fast lane like a winner,
sleeping around like a winner,
throwing down bills with his winner friends like a winner...
the text calls it loose living.
We call it independence.
Whatever we call it it is the same thing...
living like we've no responsibility to anyone but ourselves.

And he had one problem,

he wasn't really a winner...
he was spending his daddy's money.

And in the end,

when dad's money ran out
he took a job...
slopping hogs.
And that is not the job of a winner
and he is quickly brought to his humility.
The text says he came to himself...
that is, he realized who he really was.
He stopped pretending.

He was hungry.
Said to himself,

"I could go back and get a job
as a servant in my father's house...
at least I'd have a place to sleep
and food to put in my belly."

And so he sets out,

all the way making peace with moving
from independence back into dependence.

And while he was a far distance out,

his father
(who had been watching for him)
came running out to him...
and, I think, tackled him in the dirt,
hugged him,
kissed him
and them lifted him to his feet
and walked him back home.
Said,
"Put a ring on his finger,
put the finest robe on him,
kill the fatted calf...
for this my son was lost
and is now found."

This child of mine was lost in independence and winning...

but now is in my care,
dependent on me for his feeding...
let's party!

I think the bible offers us a great precedent

of what we might think about winning and losing.

Read the text for today... Mark 9:2-9

Peter.

He's peering at Moses, Elijah and Jesus.

This is a career-maker.
This is a story to be retold!
This picture is worth a million words...
But there's a problem.
No camera.
No film.
No nothing.

We can sympathize with Peter's predicament.

Let's be frank:

Peter would've done us all a big favor
if he had been better prepared.
Today we could visit his shrine --
the mountain-top retreat center...
the one built to immortalize the moment
if only he had been ready.

Imagine your grasp of history

without Abraham Zapruder's 26 seconds of film,
shot with an 8-millimeter camera on November 22, 1963.
We'd be stuck with Oliver Stone's revisionist montage in his film JFK.

Or without the grainy footage of Neil Armstrong

taking "one small step for man"
replete with scratchy audio.

Or without your LP of Tommy,

the world's first rock opera.

It's a good thing that The Who

is now available on redigitized and remastered compact disks --
along with every other LP in your collection -
because it is increasingly difficult to locate
a working stereo phonograph.

And if you own a copy of I Love Lucy classics on Betamax,

forget it.
Those eight-tracks of Tony Bennett?
Worthless,
unless you have borrowing privileges at the
Museum of Obsolete Machines.

The Zapruder film,

the Apollo 11 footage,
the census data stored by the government --
all risk disintegration or obsolescence in the new millennium.

We can launch photographs of the kids through cyberspace,

but we are losing the photographs of our own childhoods,
not to mention our ancestors' childhoods,
due to humidity, sunlight and general aging.

This hurts.

It hurts because we have such a hunger
to hang on to history.

As many of our parents have aged,

their storage closets -
left unexplored for decades -
have become fascinating excavation sites
revealing both the history of their own families' precious moments
and the history of home movie cameras:
the 8-millimeter camera,
the Super 8,
the camcorder,
the Supercam,
the Digital camcorder,
the MX Pro Mixer
with Fire Wire Technology.

These closet digs show that

the first generation of parents wielding home movie cameras
did a pretty decent job at documenting
Christmas morning and birthday parties,
graduations and weddings.

And clearly today's parents are following in their footsteps

by dutifully documenting all the usual life-changing moments of their children as well -
those transformative transitions from fetus to newborn,
from crawler to walker,
from preschooler to kindergartner.

But, because film today is less expensive

or because we're more self-absorbed than ever,
postmodern parents also capture those
NOT-so-special moments:
little Amber eating French fries,
sitting in the wagon,
banging on the piano,
digging in the dirt,
rolling in the leaves,
playing with the telephone,
wearing a hat,
smelling a flower,
holding a book,
watching TV,
singing a song,
throwing a ball,
kicking a ball,
sitting on a ball,
dropping a ball ....
you get the picture.

One family here in Tucson took inventory of their efforts

and found they had captured more than 1,800 minutes of videotaped footage
and over 3,000 still photographs
of their daughter Courtney's life.
Courtney is only 6 years old.

Can YOU say, "Overexposure"?

Unfortunately, Courtney may clean out her own closet 40 years from now,

only to discover countless faded photographs
and a mountain of obsolete cartridges
with no working video machine to play them.

Technology is moving so quickly that,

sooner than we expect,
our painstaking documentation of life
may be rendered a waste of time.
A total waste.
Time and cost equals history lost.

Optical disks,

considered innovative only a decade ago,
will soon be indecipherable,
because the system used by archivists
to transfer and store documents and images onto optical disks
is no longer available.

And although data systems can be transferred

to newer, sleeker programs,
data migration causes new problems:
Numbers do not always transfer from one system to another
without significant errors.

We're losing our grasp on history.

This, despite the fact that

more and more people are documenting
more and more information every day.

You better believe that if President Kennedy rode through Dallas today,

Abraham Zapruder would be among HUNDREDS of ordinary people
preserving the moment on film!

The "memory book" business is booming

as we search craft stores for the latest in
acid-free paper and "bookkeeper archival mist."

The "home movie to videotape" business is thriving,

as the Bell and Howell generation are warned that
"gelatin emulsion" could be eating away at their priceless memories!

We want to preserve every special moment,

and yet ...
armed with camcorders in one palm,
hermetically sealed scrapbooks in the other arm,
and countless files filled with images and personal data in our computers,
I purport we are in danger of missing something even more monumental?

Missing -

in our craving to capture it -
the God-given moment itself?

This Christmas my parents gave us a camcorder,

hoping that we would record all the moments of their granddaughters lives
to send to them in the Midwest.

So Christmas morning I began taping...

and made the painful discovery...
there is a vast difference between being an observer
and being a participant.
To carry a camera
puts something between you
and what is happening.

Peter, of course,

had no camcorder,
no digital camera,
no hand-held micro tape recorder
to capture the extraordinary moment he witnessed
along with James and John.

It was literally a mountaintop experience,

a once-in-a-lifetime experience
for three ordinary Joes who,
as disciples,
were still searching for a clue.

Peter, understandably,

was absolutely awestruck.

It was to have been a quiet retreat,

a time apart from the crowds,
but an extraordinary event was unfolding,
a moment in history so sacred that Peter,
as Vice President in Charge of Doing Something,
had to do something.

So he proposed building a booth

or kiosk
or shrine
with sidewalks and walls -
whatever -
to preserve the moment.

The thing about Peter...

he is not emotionally and spiritually present...
he was physically present
But his mind was busy thinking of ways
to be useful
and efficient
and noticeable...

Peter is the patron saint for those of us

who can be with our spouse and children or a group of friends,
with wonderful opportunities before us
to experience God moments...
but our brains are busy thinking about
all the stuff we've got to do...
the project at work,
the cleaning around the house,
the car work,
places we need to go,
clock we need to watch,
shows we need to watch...

and thus we are not emotionally or spiritually present

enough to see the God moment for what it is...
sacred.

A cloud dimmed the moment, however,

before Peter could throw anything together.
Out of the cloud a voice:
"This is my Son, the Beloved; listen to him!" (Mark 9:7).

Isn't that the basis of intimacy,

of a good relationship...
listen.

Don't start talking,

telling them how important you are,
telling jokes to convince them you're God's gift to comedy,
making profound comments to impress them with your insight and importance...
forwarding e-mail that you didn't write
to people you want to think highly of you...
Shut up.
Just listen.
Be present.

God didn't say:

"Get a shot of the three of them
over by that cedar tree."
Didn't say,
"Be sure to capture the moment!"

Just,

"Listen to him."
Bummer.

Like tourists who see Paris through their viewfinders,

Peter,
who wanted to keep the moment from passing,
was in danger of passing the moment.

Let's face it:

We, too, are easily distracted.
Our lives are noisy.
Televisions,
radios, VCRs, DVDs,
quad speakers, telephones, construction tools,
computer games and crotch rockets
fill our world with incessant sound.
Hard to hear the voice of God these days.

Just as cameras can be programmed

to print the date on the film
in order to remember exactly when an event occurred,
Mark's gospel tells us that Jesus
took Peter, James and John up to this mountain
exactly six days after reminding them that
"those who want to save their life will lose it,
and those who lose their life for my sake,
and for the sake of the gospel
will save it" (Mark 8:35).

It's not a bad idea to ask ourselves,

"What are we really losing
and what are we really keeping,
in the big picture?"
What will it profit us to preserve our life's history,
if we forget the fundamental reason for remembering?

I want to call a halt on this memory mania.

God's advice is to listen...

out beyond the honking, speeding,
screaming, headlining world...
Listen to the children,
listen to life,
listen for the sacred,
divine the divine.

And the big one.

Listen to Jesus.