Catalina United Methodist Church Home
Sunday Morning Live!
A Contemporary Service
 
Soul Talk
by Jonathan Arnpriester
 
February 20, 2000
 

I Can't Not Remember February 20, 2000
Mark 2:1-12

General George Custer,
Senator McCarthy,
Al Companis and
Elia Kazan.

What do these persons have in common?

Too difficult?

Try these:

Hugh Grant,
Jimmy Swaggart,
Jim Bakker and
Gary Hart.

If you guessed media-splashed sexual liaisons ...
good guess, but you're wrong!
But not WAY wrong.

Sex may be symptomatic of the sin for some of them,

but the real sin was a positively public
and consequential error in judgment.
Each one of these personages
made an outstanding, newsworthy and notable mistake.

Occasionally, individuals are remembered --

and let's hope that none of us joins this All-Star Tabloid Team --
not for virtuous acts,
but for naughty, nasty or nauseating big blunders.

Like that of Gavrilo Princip, for example.

Here's a guy who,
arguably more than any other individual,
played the starring role in the formation
of world history for the whole of the 20th century
... and yet you've never heard of him.

He's the one person who triggered the whole mess,

whose one action in a split second of time
altered the course of world history,
who singularly fired up an international shooting match
costing millions and millions of lives.

That's quite a load of bad karma.

Princip is the 19-year-old Serbian student

who assassinated Archduke Francis Ferdinand
in Sarajevo in 1914.

This ignited World War I,

which resulted in the Treaty of Versailles,
which further plunged Germany into an economic depression,
and deeply embittered a nondescript Austrian corporal
named Adolf Hitler.

Hitler,

in response,
booted up the great horror of World War II,
a war which ended with the division of Eastern Europe
without regard to
traditional borders,
ethnicity,
language or
religion
which hastened the research and deployment
of atomic weapons resulting in the horrors
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
and ended with a divided world and skirmish wars
in such places as Korea and Vietnam...
And also planted seeds of ethnic hostility
that have grown into localized wars and uprisings
in the 50 years since
in locations such as
Hungary, the Middle East, the Eastern bloc
and, of course, Serbia today.

Gavrilo Princip.

One man.
One moment in time.
One mistake.
One BIG mistake.
("Trigger of the Century", Richard Stengel, "Dubious Influences", TIME, June 14, 1999, 217).

Infamous Princip might be considered an anti-hero,

a minor villain whose one bullet made a terrible difference.

How awful it is to be remembered

for a deed done in one moment out of a lifetime.

We all miscalculate and bungle,

but even our mistakes can themselves be outshone
by acts of kindness and compassion.

Think of Rosa Parks.

One woman.
One moment in time.
One heroic act.
One nation changed.

Think of the nameless student in Tiananmen Square

who squared off with a tank.
One man.
One idea.
One image.

Think of the Englishwoman Emmeline Pankhurst,

whose suffragettes fought for women's vote
at the turn of the last century.

There are others whose names we have forgotten,

whose names we never knew,
whose kindnesses and heroisms
touched and changed our lives.

And yet,

they say there are no heroes anymore.

But they're there.

"Walk down any street and you will find them:
the mothers who work,
the fathers who strive,
the children who overcome.
They aren't larger than life,
but they are larger than their own lives.
Their names aren't famous,
but their virtues are.
Hard work.
Common sense.
An unshakable belief in themselves.
If you're looking for a hero, look around."
(Advertisement of Merrill Lynch, TIME, June 14, 1999, 207).

We may not know their names,

but there are always quiet heroes among us.

Perhaps we number among them.

Think of the friends of the paralytic who,

unable to get their friend in to see Dr. Jesus
because crowds blocked the door,
were able to think outside-of-the-box...
or in this case outside-of-the-house,
to find an unconventional, unorthodox and somewhat deconstructive,
but stunningly successful,
way to get the man in to see Jesus.

They hauled their friend up the outside stairs,

hitched up their skirts,
punched a hole through the adobe-type roof,
digging with their hands
until the breach was gaping enough
to hand the man down to other hands below
to lay the paralytic man on his mat at the feet of Jesus.
That's some trouble to go to for the sake of a friend.

These nameless chums have been immortalized

not for a Warholian 15 minutes of fame,
but for 20 centuries of honor.

One moment.

One simple act of kindness --
all they were after was getting their friend back on his feet...
but it changed his life,
and made everybody who was there that day say,
"We've never seen anything like this!"
And Jesus,
upon having this man lowered into his midst
sees the faith of the four friends and says,
"Your sins are forgiven."

What has your faith done for your friends?

Are we the persistent friends kneeling on the roof,
doing the grubby work of kindness
with callused hands and dirty fingernails?
How will we be remembered --
for our mistakes
or for our quiet heroism and kindnesses?

There were some others to be remembered there that day.

There were teachers of religious law who did the big
"Hmmmmmmph."
And there were the people in the front row,
pushing one another to gawk a look at Jesus
while simultaneously preventing those who need his touch from seeing him,
from even getting close?

So, church, who are we?

Whose company do we keep?

Break into groups...

two questions to talk over...

One positive thing you learned

from the persons who raised you
that you want to continue...
Something you would not repeat
but were glad you learned it...
you are a better person for overcoming it.

All the lions of the movement were there,
some quieted by age now,
hugging one another and standing for photo ops.

Julian Bond, Joseph Lowery, Ron Dellums,

Andrew Young, Dick Gregory, Jesse Jackson,
this is a group that --
these days --
gets together most often at funerals.

But [recently] they gathered at the Capitol

to honor a tiny, frail woman.
A woman who,
44 years and a lifetime ago,
came to symbolize the fight for civil rights.

And perhaps it was only fitting

that even after all the victories,
the move to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Rosa Parks
had still required activism, organizing
and a helpful dose of righteous anger.

Parks, now 86,

spoke little during the ceremony.
But her presence was a powerful reminder
that the civil rights movement,
which had been bumping along in fits and starts for years,
finally pushed its way onto the national agenda in 1955.

That was the year Parks refused to yield her seat

to a white man on a city bus in Montgomery, Alabama.
That small decision led to a lengthy black boycott of the bus system
and helped propel the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
into the forefront of the movement ....

"It is a celebration of the life of Rosa Parks

receiving this medal while she can still see it,
still feel it, still hold it,"
said Rep. Julia Carson (D-Ind.),
who introduced the legislation to award Parks the medal ....

When she got to Congress in 1997,

Carson thought Parks had already received the Congressional Gold Medal,
and said yesterday that the award was long overdue.
House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Tex.) agreed.
"I think it is overdue," he said,
"and I can offer no explanation for it.
I just hope we don't let that fact mar the occasion today."

When Carson introduced the legislation in February to honor Parks,

the bill had about 40 co-sponsors,
mostly members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
But the campaign gained momentum
after Carson wrote to the nationally syndicated Tom Joyner Morning Show,
which airs locally on WHUR-FM,
and enlisted the help of commentator and BET Tonight host Tavis Smiley.
The bill wound up with 329 cosponsors.
--Lonnae O'Neal Parker, "Token of Gratitude: 44 Years After Rosa Parks Made Civil Rights History, A Nation Says Thank You,"
The Washington Post, June 16, 1999, C1.

I am always with you.
I'm always with everybody.
This is a hard concept for most people to imagine,
so let me try to explain.

Remember in the first Superman movie

where the missile is going to blow up the house of Valerie Perrine's mother
at the same time the earthquake is about to swallow up Lois?
Superman had to let Lois get killed
because he couldn't be in two places at once.

Well, on my worst day,

I'm better than Superman.
--John Macks, Heaven Talks Back (New York: Simon & Schuster 1990), 56.
One thing I do in that book
[Living Jesus: Learning the Heart of the Gospel]
is that I spend a whole chapter
talking about the character of interpersonal learning.
What did it mean to learn
another person is opposed to learning things
or learning facts?
What are the moral and intellectual qualities involved
in learning persons?
And I found a great source for this
in the pattern of learning
that my wife and I have gone through over 20 years.
How it is not simply coming to a fix on somebody,
but it requires patience and creative fidelity
and perseverance and so forth ....

For Christians,

it's not simply a romantic notion,
but is quite serious and literally true
that when somebody walks through my door
and I receive them and listen to them,
I am learning about Jesus.

So I try to take that perspective

and then read the New Testament out of the perspective
of the various witnesses to Jesus in the New Testament.
--New Testament scholar Luke Johnson, interviewed by Becky Garrison, "Door Interview: Luke Johnson," The Door, March-April 1999, 17.
Studies show that the average person
can name between five and eight people
who've significantly shaped their lives --
people who came into their lives at different times
and made important contributions,
according to Howard Hendricks, professor at Dallas Theological Seminary.

Mentoring may seem like a one-on-one relationship on the surface,

but it's actually part of a web of mentoring connections,
with protégés having several mentors throughout their lives
and also becoming mentors to others.
The network is enhanced
when mentors pass along wisdom to their protégés,
who pass it on to their protégés,
and so on down the line. ...

Encourage multiple mentoring relationships in your church,

and provide opportunities for people of all ages
to interact and form teaching relationships.
-- "Multilevel Mentoring," Vital Ministry, January-February 1999, 55.
This is not the first time Pam Grim has headed into an unruly region.
[Earlier, she was] traveling in Haiti with a group
distributing eyeglasses and medicine.
While the group was on the road,
some people swarmed the truck,
and when the robbers failed to get what they wanted,
they shattered the van's windows with rocks.

That experience did not prevent Pam from going to Macedonia

to help the Kosovar refugees.
When the opportunity arose for her to volunteer
with Doctors of the World,
she arranged for coverage at her job
as an emergency room physician in Cleveland.
A little over a week later,
she was working in the Senokos Camp in Macedonia.
-- "Kosovo Diary," Discover, August 1999, 39.
Most Americans
are thoughtful, caring, generous.
We try to do our best by family and friends.
We'll even stop to help a fellow driver
stranded by a roadside breakdown,
or give spare change to a stranger.
But increasingly,
a wall separates each of us from the world outside,
and from others who have taken refuge
in their own private sanctuaries.
How can we renew the public participation
that's the very soul of democratic citizenship? ...

Certainly we need to decide for ourselves

whether particular causes are wise or foolish.
But we also need to believe
that our individual involvement is worthwhile,
that what we might do in the public sphere
will not be in vain.
The challenge is as much psychological as political.
As the Ethiopian proverb says,
"He who conceals his disease cannot be cured."

We need to understand our cultural diseases --

callousness, short-sightedness, denial --
and learn what it will take to heal
our society and our souls.
How did so many of us become convinced
that we can do nothing to affect the future
our children and grandchildren will inherit?
And how have others managed
to work powerfully for change?
--Paul Rogat Loeb, "Soul of a Citizen: Living with conviction in a cynical time," Utne Reader, July-August 1999, 46.
There are many who believe that
this disease is God's vengeance,
but I believe it was sent
to teach people how to love and understand
and have compassion for each other.
I have learned more about
love, selflessness and human understanding
from the people I have met
in this great adventure in the world of AIDS
than I ever did in the
cutthroat, competitive world
in which I spent my life.
--Anthony Perkins, actor, quoted by Joanne Lynn and Joan Harrold in
Handbook for Mortals: Guidance for People Facing Serious Illness
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 110.

To a certain generation of a certain political stripe,
Elia Kazan will always be the Whittaker Chambers of Hollywood --
minus Alger Hiss, of course,
because the director never seemed to come up with the big score,
never gave the House Committee on Un-American Activities [HUAC]
the mole who fed Mosfilm, say,
Darryl Zanuck's secret formula for box office success. ...

Kazan says ...

that he had become convinced that the Soviet Union
was a monolithic evil empire
that had started the Korean War
and was operating a dangerous and subversive network
of clandestine cells.
He vigorously denies
that he informed to protect his movie career,
and once again advances the notion that,
because he named only people who were already known,
it was no big deal.
He does allow,
as an afterthought,
that "they, of course, suffered some from it."

Although it's true that

he could have done much more damage than he did,
the point worth emphasizing is that
Kazan's big score,
the Alger Hiss he delivered to HUAC,
was himself.
As Victor Navasky has pointed out,
the "naming" ritual
was not intended to expose new Reds and fellow travelers;
it was a way of legitimizing HUAC
and its enterprise.
Kazan had enormous prestige in those days,
based on his artistic achievements
and his participation in the social struggles of the '30s.
His was a life that combined art and politics,
incomprehensible today
after decades of Cold War rhetoric
have driven a wedge between the two.
Had he thrown his moral authority against HUAC,
it would have constituted a stinging rebuke,
encouraging others to do the same.
As it was,
he not only jumped the wrong way,
he went the extra mile,
groveling before Parnell Thomas and Richard Nixon, et al. --
no William Empson they --
in his textual explications of pictures like Viva Zapata!,
intended to demonstrate that they were actually blows against communism.
Such desperation suggests that
concerns about his Hollywood career
were never far from his mind ....

As Orson Welles is famously supposed to have said,

"Kazan traded his soul for a swimming pool."
--Peter Biskind, "Dirty Realism," a review of Jeff Young's book,
Kazan: The Master Director Discusses His Films: Interviews With Elia Kazan
(Newmarket Press, 1999), The Los Angeles Times, July 18, 1999, www.latimes.com

The Marine Corps wrote the book on
developing fearsome competitors.
Now former Marines Dan Carrison and Rod Walsh
have written a book on the training practices that set the corps apart.
The book is called
Semper Fi: Business Leadership the Marine Corps Way (AMACOM, 1998).
Here [is one lesson] that the authors have learned. ...

Share war stories.

One boot-camp course uses
"warrior stations,"
each of which is built around
a heroic feat performed by a Marine.
Each station displays a photograph of the Marine
plus an inscription about his deed,
and every team must re-enact the same feat.
Afterward, every recruit knows that
he belongs to a unique group.
--Polly LaBarre, "Andy Brown Wants You," Fast Company, June 1999, 66.
Earthquakes, WAR, murder, the burning of libraries --
bad things happen fast.
Reforestation, the growth of a child, the maturing of an adult, building a library --
good things happen slowly.

That's not universally true, of course,

but it's true enough to wonder if there is a structural explanation.
I think there are several.
One is simple:
Construction usually requires sequential elements of assembly,
whereas destruction can be done all at once.
Another explanation is embodied
in all the folk wisdom about
the carelessness of haste.

Early researchers in artificial intelligence

came across yet another explanation,
a phenomenon they called hill climbing.
Imagine a mountain range of opportunities,
where the higher you get,
the greater the advantage.
Hasty opportunists will never get past the foothills
because they pay attention
only to the slope of the ground under their feet,
climb quickly to the immediate hilltop,
and get stuck there.
Patient opportunists take the longer view
to the distant peaks
and toil through many ups and downs
on the long trek to the heights.
--Stewart Brand, The Clock of the Long Now (New York: Basic Books, 1999), 156.
Asked one day for a mathematical formula
for success in his life,
Albert Einstein gave the following:

"If a is success in life,

the formula is,
a = x + y + z,
x being work and
y being play."
"And what is z?"
he was asked.
"z," he said,
"is keeping your mouth shut."
--Source unknown.